The potential of technology is constantly growing with time,
and the robo-readers are just advancement, but a controversial one at that.
Based on the numerous passages that I have read, the programs seem to do a
great job on the basis of syntax, grammar, and structure. But, this is only a
small part of what writing is about. I agree with source E that if all of
teachers would adapt to this new way of grading, much of the essence of the
English language would be lost, and writers would reform the way it is written.
I obviously agree that there are problems with the writing of the youth on the
basis of syntax, grammar, and structure, and this program may help to revise
that, but there is so much more to be assessed. Once these skills are mastered
by students, the robo-readers become useless.
As stated in source
b, the robos have many flaws in what they believe is a good paper. More words
and sophisticated language are important, but the fact that the machines do not
recognize the error in content and ideas because a problem when correcting more
sophisticated works, especially when leaning more to the creative side of the
writing spectrum.
Being a student writer myself, I would agree with the
article source F in that students will spend less time crafting beautiful work
if they know that only a machine will read it. Plus will all of the ways to
fool the reader, as mentioned in sources B, E, and F, there are so many ways to
fool the systems, that students will soon take these shortcuts and end of worse
writers than they were before. The quality of writing will plummet. As if
students weren’t already unmotivated to do their homework.
Plus, the robos lack an essential part of the editing
process: the ability to assess the ideas and give feedback on them. That is
what is most helpful to me is the corrections of my ideas and content of the
essay. I can grammar check it for myself, but I can’t inquire the thoughts of
the teachers who have been disciplined to be experts on the matter. So
ultimately, contradicting source d, we will not end up better writers, but even
worse than before. We do not improve so much as writer more, but thinking about
what to write.
These programs seem to be a good idea to be possibly leased
to the students to edit their own papers beforehand, but not as the final
assessment of their work. It could become a very advanced version of spell
check, which may make us better writings, but not to only rely on them. Plus,
how many responsibilities can we take from humans and give to computers?